Undergraduate Medical Education Program Evaluation Strategy



Download 98.3 Kb.
Page14/16
Date22.04.2018
Size98.3 Kb.
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16
Program

Objectives

Program

Implementaion

Program

Outcomes

Sources of

Data

  • 360 Evaluation

  • PGY1 Evaluations

  • Examination Reviews

  • LMCC

  • AAMC Grad Survey

Type of

Evaluation

Formative Evaluation

Summative

Evaluation

This strategy will consist primarily of process and outcome evaluations. However, some specific sources of data will also assess the unmet needs of medical students, reflecting needs assessment. The three evaluation components are discussed below.
Needs Assessment
Needs assessments will help to identify and measure the level of unmet needs within the UGME program at the U of S. Essentially, needs assessments will detect areas in which students may need additional training or preparation. Measures which may help detect areas of unmet need include the Goals and Objectives self-assessment and 360 evaluation (i.e., items which receive low overall ratings may be areas of unmet need) and comments provided through the SCRC and SMSS.
Process Evaluation
Process evaluation components of the evaluation framework will determine the extent to which the UGME curriculum is being implemented as intended. Specifically, this will examine the extent to which various intended aspects of the UGME program are:


Specifically, the intended and actual goals, objectives, inputs, activities, and outputs of the UGME will be identified. Then, any discrepancies between what is intended and what is actually delivered will be hi-lighted. Measures included in the process evaluation component of this framework include course evaluations, examination reviews, and feedback from the SCRC.


Outcome Evaluation
Outcome evaluations measure the extent to which students are achieving various outcomes in accordance with the UGME’s goals and objectives. Such outcomes may include performance on the LMCC, achievement of the College’s goals and objectives as measured through self-assessment and multisource evaluations, and performance on re-tests of first year examinations.





Share with your friends:
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16


The database is protected by copyright ©psyessay.org 2017
send message

    Main page
mental health
health sciences
gandhi university
Rajiv gandhi
Chapter introduction
multiple choice
research methods
south africa
language acquisition
Relationship between
qualitative research
literature review
Curriculum vitae
early childhood
relationship between
Masaryk university
nervous system
Course title
young people
Multiple choice
bangalore karnataka
state university
Original article
academic performance
essay plans
social psychology
psychology chapter
Front matter
United states
Research proposal
sciences bangalore
Mental health
compassion publications
workplace bullying
publications sorted
comparative study
chapter outline
mental illness
Course outline
decision making
sciences karnataka
working memory
Literature review
clinical psychology
college students
systematic review
problem solving
research proposal
human rights
Learning objectives
karnataka proforma