It took 3000 years, and this strategy, for one cult, To Rule This World Freeing us, and the ‘Jews’, from The Cult,

By the rivers of Babylon…where we dasheth thy little ones against the stones

Download 1.81 Mb.
Size1.81 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   31

By the rivers of Babylon…where we dasheth thy little ones against the stones

The Torah was started and ‘completed’ while the Cult leaders were living in Babylon. They claim it was based on ‘oral traditions’, however much of it was clearly ‘invented’ in Babylon, and ‘interpolated’ by the Levite scribes.

For example, fifteen chapters of the book of Isaiah were clearly written 200 years after Isaiah had lived, by someone who had lived in Bablyon. And thus they couldn’t have been an oral tradition. Christian scholars circumvent this by calling the unknown man Deutero-Isaiah, that is, ‘the second Isaiah’.

We have Isaiah saying ‘The Lord hath said. . . I will also give thee for a light unto the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth’. In other words the ‘Jews’ were to be our salvation, and not our destruction.

However basic Cult doctrine is that all people who do not belong to the Cult of Judah are to be either enslaved or slaughtered. You can hardly be a guiding light and savior to people you are either going to enslave or butcher.

So to keep Isaiah, whom many ‘Jews’ must have remembered as belongin to their oral traditions / histories, the Levite scribes added the typical non-sequitur, self-contradicting, self-cancelling statement that ‘the kings and queens’ of the Gentiles ‘shall bow down to thee with their face towards the earth and lick up the dust of thy feet . . . I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with sweet wine; and all flesh shall know that I am the Lord thy Saviour and thy Redeemer’.

Such non-sequitur, self-cancelling, self-negating statements are typical of the ‘Jewish’ witnesses at Brendon O’Connell’s, trial, and for the government prosecutor. They struck me as quite singular. I had wondered where such forms had been learned. Now I know. They are ‘typical’ Cult of Judah-ism forms.

In the same way, Jeremiah is presented initially with the typical Cult mentality: ‘… I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy…’

Later, though, he states that: ‘The word of the Lord came to me saying, Go and cry in the ears of Jerusalem, saying…What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me . . . my people have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters . . ." He is speaking more like Jesus would later. Criticising the Cult of Judah for having ‘forsaken’ the principles of their forefathers, in favor of the ‘dead’ words of their laws and statutes. This supports the idea that the original religion of the Hebrews was originally much more like the teachings of Jesus, than the ‘Judaism’ we have been handed by the Cult of Judah.

Jeremiah then identified the culprit, Judah (and for this offence well may have come by his death): "The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah". Israel had fallen from grace, but Judah had betrayed…’ The implication is that the Cult of Judah has betrayed the original principles of the Hebrew’s religion, and replaced it with an imposter. Their own ‘Cult of Judah’. And so we have another precursor to Jesus. Just like the Jesus we know, Jeremiah, and other prophets who dared criticize the Cult of Judah, paid with their lives.

"Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord. . ." (the formal, repetitious incantations) ". . . but thoroughly amend your ways and your doings, oppress not the stranger, the fatherless and the widow, and shed not innocent blood in this place" (the ritual of blood-sacrifice and the ordained murder of apostates). . . "Will ye steal, murder and commit adultery, and swear falsely. . . and come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, We are delivered to do all these abominations" (the ceremonial absolution after animal-sacrifice). "Is this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your eyes? . . I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices…."

In such words Jeremiah, like Jesus later, protested against the "destruction" of the Law in the name of its fulfilment. It seems possible that even in Jeremiah's time the Levites still exacted the sacrifice of firstborn children, because he adds, "And they have built the high place. . . to burn their sons and daughters in the fire; which I commanded not, neither came it into my heart".

Because of these very "abominations", Jeremiah continued, the Lord would "cause to cease from the cities of Judah, and from the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of mirth, and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom, and the voice of the bride; for the land shall be desolate".

This is the famous political forecast which was borne out; the Levites, with their genius for perversion, later invoked it to support their claim that Judah fell because their Law was not observed, whereas Jeremiah's warning was that their Law itself would destroy "treacherous Judah". Were he to rise from the earth today he might use the word without change in respect of Zionism, for the state of affairs is similar and the ultimate consequence seems equally foreseeable.

To restate Reeds comments, the prophets stated clearly that God had forsaken the Jews because of their obedience to the perverse laws and statutes of the Cult of Judah, and had abandoned the spirit of the Hebrews original teachings of universal love, justice, and peace, and not, as the Cult itself suggests, because they would not submit to them fully, and unhestitatingly, and unthinkingly.

Now when Boney M made that lovely song from the 137th Psalm ‘By the rivers of Babylon’, they politically left out key passages. ‘By the waters of Babylon we sat down … Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.’

This is definitive ‘Judaism’. Just like the ‘ripping apart pregnant women’ Mosaic ‘law’ commands of ‘good’ ‘Jews’.

By the time the Judahites returned from Babylon to Jerusalem, about 538 BCE, after the ‘fall’ of Babylon, this was the ‘moral code’ they were to force upon their brethren.

While around the world religions like ‘Buddhism’ were teaching empathy, compassion, logic and reason, the Cult of Judah-ism was teaching irrational hatred, malice, and genocidal, rapacious, vicious, destruction.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   31

The database is protected by copyright © 2017
send message

    Main page
mental health
health sciences
gandhi university
Rajiv gandhi
Chapter introduction
multiple choice
research methods
south africa
language acquisition
Relationship between
qualitative research
literature review
Curriculum vitae
early childhood
relationship between
Masaryk university
nervous system
Course title
young people
Multiple choice
bangalore karnataka
state university
Original article
academic performance
essay plans
social psychology
psychology chapter
Front matter
United states
Research proposal
sciences bangalore
Mental health
compassion publications
workplace bullying
publications sorted
comparative study
chapter outline
mental illness
Course outline
decision making
sciences karnataka
working memory
Literature review
clinical psychology
college students
systematic review
problem solving
research proposal
human rights
Learning objectives
karnataka proforma