Dunya van Troost, Jacquelien van Stekelenburg, Bert Klandermans



Download 118.41 Kb.
Page1/11
Date18.04.2018
Size118.41 Kb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11



Chapter 10
Emotions of Protest
Dunya van Troost, Jacquelien van Stekelenburg, Bert Klandermans

Introduction

Politics—and especially politics of protest—are full of emotions. People are angry about austerity measures, thrilled or fearful about the Arab Spring and indignant because they want real democracy now!1 Clearly, there is an emotional side to how people react to their social and political environment (Conover & Feldman, 1986; Lyman, 2004; Marcus, 2003; Marcus et al., 2000; Way & Masters, 1996). Politics of protest are imbued with emotions. In fact, protest is inconceivable without emotions. It is emotions which “give ideas, ideologies, identities and even interests their power to motivate” (Jasper, 1997, p. 127). Social movements are carriers of meaning and organizers do their utmost to create moral outrage and to provide a target against which this can be vented. They must weave together a moral, cognitive, and emotional package of attitudes. Organizers appeal to ‘attack emotions’ such as anger to create ‘fire in the belly and iron in the soul’ (Gamson, 1992, p. 32). However, ‘just’ being angry is not enough, as Martin Luther King aptly stated: ‘It is not enough for people to be angry - the supreme task is to organize and unite people so that their anger becomes a transforming force’. Social movements use their power, resources and creativity to turn individual grievances and emotions into collective claims and to stage opportunities to act upon these claims.

Emotions have become a popular research area in the study of contentious politics. Such was not always the case. Classic breakdown theories on collective action used emotion terms as explanatory variables but equated emotion with irrationality. As rational approaches like resource mobilization theory (for example, McCarthy & Zald, 1976) or political process theory (for example, McAdam, 1982) became the state of the art, protesters were seen as ‘rationally’ motivated actors, and emotional aspects were left out the explanatory models (Goodwin & Jasper, 1999). Nevertheless, around the beginning of the 21st century, the previously held implicit assumption that emotion and rationality contrast each other has been refuted (Aminzade & McAdam, 2002; Emirbayer & Goldberg, 2005; Gould, 2009).

Organizers of protest do not feel constrained by whatever paradigmatic shift. ‘Emotion work’ has always been a key to the organization of protest. Take the following quote from Malcolm X: “Usually when people are sad, they don't do anything. They just cry over their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about social change. Malcolm X points to an important characteristic of emotions; that is, that emotions propel behavior, but perhaps even more important, different emotions propel different behavior. This is the basic tenet of appraisal theory of emotions. A second central tenet of appraisal theory is that people can evaluate―or appraise―the same event differently and consequently have different emotional responses. This chapter will lay out a theoretical framework that links individuals’ appraisals of the socio-political context to emotions of protest. Appraisals―particularly group-based appraisals―play a crucial role in that respect. As people categorize themselves as group members, individual emotions turn into group-based emotions; “I feel for us”. Group-based appraisals shape group-based emotions, and consequently collective behavior. Our theoretical model― as depicted in Figure 1―holds protest emotions dependent on the socio-political context in which a contested issue emerges. This relationship between context and emotion is mediated by appraisals―evaluations―of the social and political context. The resulting emotions interact with the motivation to participate in protest or to abstain from it.










Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11


The database is protected by copyright ©psyessay.org 2017
send message

    Main page
mental health
health sciences
gandhi university
Rajiv gandhi
Chapter introduction
multiple choice
research methods
south africa
language acquisition
Relationship between
qualitative research
literature review
Curriculum vitae
early childhood
relationship between
Masaryk university
nervous system
Course title
young people
Multiple choice
bangalore karnataka
state university
Original article
academic performance
essay plans
social psychology
psychology chapter
Front matter
United states
Research proposal
sciences bangalore
Mental health
compassion publications
workplace bullying
publications sorted
comparative study
chapter outline
mental illness
Course outline
decision making
sciences karnataka
working memory
Literature review
clinical psychology
college students
systematic review
problem solving
research proposal
human rights
Learning objectives
karnataka proforma